Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/15/2002 01:26 PM House RES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 302-ALASKA GAS CORPORATION CO-CHAIR MASEK announced the first order of business, HOUSE BILL NO. 302, "An Act establishing the Alaska Gas Corporation, a public corporation, and providing for its structure, management, responsibilities, and operation, and requiring the development of a project plan to evaluate whether construction and operation of a natural gas transmission pipeline project by the corporation is feasible." Number 0100 REPRESENTATIVE JIM WHITAKER, Alaska State Legislature, sponsor, came forward to present HB 302, joined by staff person Lori Backes. He offered his belief that a legislative effort of this nature can facilitate construction of a successful gas pipeline project. However, a new element has arisen, an initiative that will put before the voters in November another "gas entity," a port authority that is a corporate entity. He said the problem with the initiative is that rather than letting the market determine where gas should or shouldn't go, it specifies a "Prudhoe Bay-to-Valdez LNG [liquefied natural gas] approach to gas." He remarked, "We've gone beyond that, and I think that we would muddy the waters significantly unless we provide an alternative to that initiative." He offered his belief that HB 302 does that. REPRESENTATIVE WHITAKER brought attention to a legal opinion in committee packets from Jack Chenoweth [of Legislative Legal and Research Services], which he said indicates Mr. Chenoweth "sees no reason that House Bill 302 is not significantly similar to the initiative, as to make the initiative moot." Generally, in addition to being a better idea than the initiative, he said, HB 302 will have an effect that is significant, including significant revenue advantages to the state relating to ownership. Mentioning competition with regard to pipeline access, as well as in-state usage issues, he suggested that it is appropriate, if not imperative, that the state have an ownership position with regard to a natural gas pipeline. CO-CHAIR MASEK requested Representative Fate's comments, since he is a member of the House Special Committee on Oil and Gas, which had heard the bill previously. Number 0431 REPRESENTATIVE FATE said he thought Mr. Chenoweth's memorandum speaks well for it, and that [the bill] is a little broader in scope [than the initiative]. He offered his own opinion that it is a very good bill. CO-CHAIR MASEK asked whether anyone wished to testify; there was no response. The committee took an at-ease from 1:28 p.m. to 1:29 p.m. Number 0514 REPRESENTATIVE FATE moved to report HB 302 out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying zero fiscal note. There being no objection, HB 302 was moved out of the House Resources Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|